This sample will guide you through:
- Introduction on Statistical Method
- Review of Immigration
Introduction
Social science theory encompasses general theories that explain society's actions and behaviors, including sociological, political, and philosophical ideas. It's used to distinguish and generalize between different societies and analyze modernity's emergence over the centuries. This study focuses on assessing the challenges faced by immigrants, as they relate to societal issues arising from immigration. It delves into cultural patterns within the country and frames questions accordingly.
Review
Immigration is regarded as the international movement of the individual into the destination country of which they are not the natives. Further they do not have the citizenship for the purpose of settling down specifically as permanent residents. With such there is various issues attached that are being faced by the people of society. This is attached with both people who are migrating and the one who are already residing internationally. This can be in terms of job opportunities and cultural aspect. Along with this the extent to which the law are developed related with discrimination among the country reveals the amount of discrimination that can be done towards immigrants. These are regarded as several aspects that related with social science which has greater impact on society in whole. Thus such factors are taken into accounts so that study can be carried out in an effective manner.
The aims and objectives related with social science are enumerated in the manner below:
Aim:
The aim of the present research is: To identify if immigrants face discrimination issues
Research questions
- Do immigrants impact cultural pattern prevailing within country?
- Do immigrants qualification affects the job opportunities for the people who are the resident of the country?
- What is relationship between individual's perceptions about law against ethnic discrimination in workplace and the discrimination among the immigrants?
- What is the impact of government's behavior & shared religious patter on immigrants' way to feel closer to the country?
Analysis
Theme 1: Immigrants impact on cultural pattern prevailing within country?
Correlations |
||||
Immigration bad or good for country's economy |
Country's cultural life undermined or enriched by immigrants |
|||
Immigration bad or good for country's economy |
Pearson Correlation |
1 |
.589** |
|
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.000 |
|||
N |
1752 |
1739 |
||
Country's cultural life undermined or enriched by immigrants |
Pearson Correlation |
.589** |
1 |
|
Sig. (2-tailed) |
.000 |
|||
N |
1739 |
1773 |
||
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). |
Interpretation: In the above analysis table society changes and its impact on the people is being assessed. This is important factors in the social theory. This is being done by the using tool such as correlation. Correlation is regarded as the mutual association among the two variables. From the table above it has been analyzed that value of significance is 0.589. This implies that it is above 0.05. Thus it reflects that there is no significant difference among the variables. With this it can be stated that immigrants to greater extent affects the cultural patterns that exists within the country.
Theme 2: Immigrants qualification affects the job opportunities for the people who are the resident of the country
Model Summary |
|||||
Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std. Error of the Estimate |
|
1 |
.291a |
.085 |
.083 |
1.869 |
|
a. Predictors: (Constant), Qualification for immigration: committed to way of life in country, Qualification for immigration: speak country's official language, Qualification for immigration: good educational qualifications, Qualification for immigration: work skills needed in country |
ANOVA |
|||||||
Model |
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
||
1 |
Regression |
545.792 |
4 |
136.448 |
39.082 |
.000b |
|
Residual |
5882.860 |
1685 |
3.491 |
||||
Total |
6428.651 |
1689 |
|||||
a. Dependent Variable: Immigrants take jobs away in country or create new jobs |
|||||||
b. Predictors: (Constant), Qualification for immigration: committed to way of life in country, Qualification for immigration: speak country's official language, Qualification for immigration: good educational qualifications, Qualification for immigration: work skills needed in country |
Coefficients |
|||||||
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
|||
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
|||||
1 |
(Constant) |
7.692 |
.128 |
60.297 |
.000 |
||
Qualification for immigration: good educational qualifications |
.036 |
.024 |
.052 |
1.523 |
.128 |
||
Qualification for immigration: speak country's official language |
-.026 |
.018 |
-.046 |
-1.489 |
.137 |
||
Qualification for immigration: work skills needed in country |
-.068 |
.022 |
-.108 |
-3.115 |
.002 |
||
Qualification for immigration: committed to way of life in country |
-.163 |
.020 |
-.224 |
-8.180 |
.000 |
||
a. Dependent Variable: Immigrants take jobs away in country or create new jobs |
Interpretation: Regression is regarded as the measure of relation among the mean value of one variable as well as corresponding value of other variables. The table above reflects impact of variables relating to qualifications on the immigrants taking away the job or creating the job. It can be interpreted that significance value of sound educational qualification is 0.128. This reflects that such is higher than significance value that is 0.05. Hence there is no significant difference among good educational qualification and job taken away by immigrants. This reflects that educational qualification among the immigrants has greater impact on the immigrants taking job or creating job away within the country. This demonstrates lack of job opportunities for the one who are local resident of the particular country.
Further the significance value of Qualification for immigration: speak country's official language is 0.137. This reflects that such is higher that significance value that is 0.05. Hence there is no significant difference among speaking country's official language and job taken away by immigrants. This reflects that speaking official language by immigrants has greater impact on the immigrants taking job or creating job away within the country. This demonstrates reduction in job opportunities for the one who are local resident of the particular country.
On the other hand the significance value of Qualification for immigration: work skills needed in country is 0.002. This reflects that such is lower that significance value that is 0.05. Hence there is significant difference among working skills needed within the country and job taken away by immigrants. This reflects that working skills needed in the country has no impact on the immigrants taking job or creating job away within the country.
Along with this the significance value of Qualification for immigration: committed to way of life in country is 0.000. This reflects that such is lower that significance value that is 0.05. Hence there is significant difference among Qualification for immigration: committed to way of life in country and job taken away by immigrants. This reflects that way of life in the country has no impact on the immigrants taking job or creating job away within the country.
Overall it can be stated that there is weaker relationship among the variables and qualifications and creation or taking away of job by the immigrants.
Theme 3: Relationship between individual's perceptions about law against ethnic discrimination in workplace and the discrimination among the immigrants
ANOVA |
|||||||
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
|||
Discrimination of respondent's group: colour or race |
Between Groups |
.074 |
10 |
.007 |
1.182 |
.298 |
|
Within Groups |
10.857 |
1742 |
.006 |
||||
Total |
10.931 |
1752 |
|||||
Discrimination of respondent's group: nationality |
Between Groups |
.117 |
10 |
.012 |
1.041 |
.406 |
|
Within Groups |
19.654 |
1742 |
.011 |
||||
Total |
19.772 |
1752 |
|||||
Discrimination of respondent's group: religion |
Between Groups |
.070 |
10 |
.007 |
1.034 |
.412 |
|
Within Groups |
11.848 |
1742 |
.007 |
||||
Total |
11.918 |
1752 |
|||||
Discrimination of respondent's group: language |
Between Groups |
.052 |
10 |
.005 |
1.010 |
.433 |
|
Within Groups |
8.902 |
1742 |
.005 |
||||
Total |
8.954 |
1752 |
|||||
Discrimination of respondent's group: ethnic group |
Between Groups |
.112 |
10 |
.011 |
1.045 |
.403 |
|
Within Groups |
18.682 |
1742 |
.011 |
||||
Total |
18.794 |
1752 |
|||||
Discrimination of respondent's group: age |
Between Groups |
.119 |
10 |
.012 |
.957 |
.480 |
|
Within Groups |
21.605 |
1742 |
.012 |
||||
Total |
21.724 |
1752 |
|||||
Discrimination of respondent's group: gender |
Between Groups |
1.023 |
10 |
.102 |
2.983 |
.001 |
|
Within Groups |
59.713 |
1742 |
.034 |
||||
Total |
60.736 |
1752 |
|||||
Discrimination of respondent's group: sexuality |
Between Groups |
.009 |
10 |
.001 |
.299 |
.982 |
|
Within Groups |
4.977 |
1742 |
.003 |
||||
Total |
4.986 |
1752 |
|||||
Discrimination of respondent's group: disability |
Between Groups |
.063 |
10 |
.006 |
.933 |
.501 |
|
Within Groups |
11.854 |
1742 |
.007 |
||||
Total |
11.918 |
1752 |
|||||
Discrimination of respondent's group: other grounds |
Between Groups |
.162 |
10 |
.016 |
.573 |
.837 |
|
Within Groups |
49.354 |
1742 |
.028 |
||||
Total |
49.516 |
1752 |
|||||
Discrimination of respondent's group: don't know |
Between Groups |
.001 |
10 |
.000 |
.109 |
1.000 |
|
Within Groups |
.999 |
1742 |
.001 |
||||
Total |
.999 |
1752 |
|||||
Discrimination of respondent's group: refusal |
Between Groups |
.000 |
10 |
.000 |
. |
. |
|
Within Groups |
.000 |
1742 |
.000 |
||||
Total |
.000 |
1752 |
|||||
Discrimination of respondent's group: not applicable |
Between Groups |
1.901 |
10 |
.190 |
2.527 |
.005 |
|
Within Groups |
131.105 |
1742 |
.075 |
||||
Total |
133.006 |
1752 |
|||||
Discrimination of respondent's group: no answer |
Between Groups |
.000 |
10 |
.000 |
. |
. |
|
Within Groups |
.000 |
1742 |
.000 |
||||
Total |
.000 |
1752 |
Interpretation: From the above table it can be interpreted that the significance in case of all the discrimination variables that is on the basis of color or race, nationality, language, ethnic group, age, sexuality, religion and disability, other groups is higher than 0.05. This implies that there is no significant association among the variables. Such reflects that there is greater relationship amongindividual's perceptions about law against ethnic discrimination in workplace and the discrimination among the immigrants. On the other it has been examined that discrimination of respondent's group: gender has significance value that 0.001. This is less than 0.05. Hence is there is significant difference among the variables. Thus implies that individual's perceptions about law against ethnic discrimination in workplace and the discrimination among the immigrants on basis of gender have no relationship.
Theme 4: The impact of government's behavior & shared religious patter on immigrants' way to feel closer to the country
Model Summary |
|||||
Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std. Error of the Estimate |
|
1 |
.133a |
.018 |
.016 |
.567 |
|
a. Predictors: (Constant), Compared to yourself government treats new immigrants better or worse, Better for a country if almost everyone shares customs and traditions |
ANOVA |
|||||||
Model |
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
||
1 |
Regression |
8.693 |
2 |
4.346 |
13.500 |
.000b |
|
Residual |
483.884 |
1503 |
.322 |
||||
Total |
492.577 |
1505 |
|||||
a. Dependent Variable: Feel close to country |
|||||||
b. Predictors: (Constant), Compared to yourself government treats new immigrants better or worse, Better for a country if almost everyone shares customs and traditions |
Coefficients |
|||||||
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
|||
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
|||||
1 |
(Constant) |
1.109 |
.067 |
16.480 |
.000 |
||
Better for a country if almost everyone shares customs and traditions |
.067 |
.015 |
.115 |
4.343 |
.000 |
||
Compared to yourself government treats new immigrants better or worse |
.027 |
.017 |
.041 |
1.560 |
.119 |
||
a. Dependent Variable: Feel close to country |
Interpretation: The table above reflects impact of government's behavior & shared religious patter on immigrants' way to feel closer to the country. It can be interpreted that significance value of Better for a country if almost everyone shares customs and traditions is 0.000. This reflects that such is lower than significance value that is 0.05. Hence there is significant difference among shared religion and immigrant's way of getting closer to country. This reflects that shared religion has greater impact on the way of immigrants getting closer to the country.
On the other hand it can be stated that significance value of government treats new immigrants is 0.119. This reflects that such is higher than significance value that is 0.05. Hence there is no significant difference among government treats and immigrant's way of getting closer to country. This reflects that treatment from government has greater impact on the way of immigrants getting closer to the country.
Conclusion
It can be concluded from the present study that immigrants to greater extent affects the cultural patterns that exists within the country. get the best homework help from a professional writer with coursework help. This is because the people who are migrating to another nation can be influenced by the change in the culture. Along with this it has been inferred that way of life in the country has no impact on the immigrants taking job or creating job away within the country. Further it is being assessed that individual's perceptions about law against ethnic discrimination in workplace and the discrimination among the immigrants on basis of gender have no relationship. Moreover treatment from government has greater impact on the way of immigrants getting closer to the country.